The Armenian-Azeri conflict in Daghlig Garabagh comprises of eight areas which empower the thorough investigation of this issue. The primary segment is given to the regional cases of Armenia focusing on Azerbaijan and its occupation war planning to cut Karabakh off Azerbaijan. This area characterized the derivation of "Karabakh" and gave data on the history, domain and outskirts of Karabakh and partitioned the historical backdrop of Karabakh into a few sections as per the verifiable improvement of Azerbaijan and mirrored the headliners. The investigation of the verifiable advancement of Karabakh demonstrated that the Karabakh was a fundamental piece of Azerbaijan and created as per the historical backdrop of Azerbaijan. The segment likewise mirrored the actualities of the authentic underlying foundations of the regional cases of Armenia, the occupation war of Armenia against Azerbaijan. The second area is given to the relations between the Karabakh issue and Armenian issue. To give the full thought of the Armenians includes the area mirrors the basic perspectives of the main logicians of the world and the statements of Armenians about themselves.
The thirds segment gave wide scope on the start of occupation war of Armenian furnished troops against Azerbaijan, the procedure of war, the control of Azeri terrains and the occupation administration set up on the said lands. It additionally considered the settlement of the contention and Azerbaijan's feeling on the settlement of the contention.
The fourth segment of the contention mirrored the Khodjaly genocide conferred amid the Armenians' occupation war against Azerbaijan. That area viewed the Khadjaly genocide as the most horrendous occasion of the 21st century and mirrored the state of mind of the world group to the genocide and the outflows of the witnesses.
The fifth area is dedicated to the helpful fiasco submitted by the occupation war of Armenia against Azerbaijan. The segment demonstrated that the occupation action of Armenia in Karabakh and different districts of Azerbaijan was went with the fear based oppressor acts. It gave data of the hard existence of evacuees and IDP, prisoners and missed individuals, Armenians' brutal treatment of Azeri prisoners abusing every one of the standards of humanism and global rights, the treatment of ladies and youngsters who turned into the casualties of Armenian occupation.
The 6th segment reflected one of the necessary parts of the fear based oppression the significant wellspring of peril in the present-day world-the Armenian psychological warfare, the Armenian psychological oppressor associations, the psychological oppressor acts submitted in Azerbaijan and their sequence. It puts the certainties ended up being the state supporting the worldwide psychological warfare.
The seventh area is dedicated to the hard financial outcomes of the Armenians' control of Azeri grounds. It first gives the realities on the characteristic stores of Azeri terrains possessed by Armenians. At that point the harm brought about to the grounds is grouped as per diverse circles and the size of the biological, social, monetary and material harm is resolved. It likewise mirrored the Armenians' vandalism appeared in the treatment of the recorded landmarks of Azerbaijan.
The correspondence of the consequences of the Karabakh issue settlement is reflected in the uncommon, eighth area of the matter. It secured the Kurekchay contract marked between the Karabakh khanate and Russian domain on May 14, 1805, the Gulistan contract marked amongst Russia and Iran in 1813 and Turkmenchay contract marked in 1828, reports on the counter Azerbaijan action of the Armenian Dashnaksutyun party, the records and materials on the Karabakh struggle of the National Front of Azerbaijan (1918-1920) and of the Soviet time frame. The segment likewise gave careful consideration to the records and materials on the expelling of Azerbaijanis of Armenia SSR in 1948-1953. The authentic archives likewise incorporate the resolutions and records of UN, OSCE and Parliamentary Assembly of the European Council.
Comments
Post a Comment